Susan Sarandon as Bette Davis in FEUD Smoking

FEUD premieres tonight on FX, and like many classic film fans, I’m watching to see how legends Bette Davis and Joan Crawford are portrayed, and I’ll be paying particular attention to one area of costuming.

Susan Sarandon plays Davis. The latter actress, while capable of glamour and being beautiful onscreen, always favored her performances over the strictures of the star machine that led more wary or canny actresses to compromise on characterization in favor of not lowering beauty standards too far. Davis felt no restriction. She wanted her Mildred Rogers in OF HUMAN BONDAGE (1934) to look as sickly as possible when the script called for that, and she pushed for her WHAT EVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE? (1962) costume to be more extreme than as originally designed.

Sarandon has shown a willingness to deglam onscreen for the right roles, but offscreen she’s been a poster girl for not looking her age or letting it determine whether she should be sexy on the red carpet and how. A favorite outfit of hers to wear to movie launches, so much so it’s almost a uniform, is a suit with no shirt worn underneath its jacket, often leaving a pretty bra visible for all to see. If her bra isn’t in view, its push-up effects leave no doubt of its presence.

I’m finding it ironic that an actress sartorially famous for her bras and gravity defying chest is playing one who eschewed underwire bras, despite being as generously endowed. As the recent Orry-Kelly documentary, WOMEN HE’S UNDRESSED (2015) revealed Davis was convinced wearing underwire caused breast cancer. The costume designer was left having to camouflage that the leading lady was undersupported or braless by “using foulards, pockets, buttons, and other visual tricks.”

So while I’m watching FEUD, I’m going to be looking at Sarandon’s silhouette to see if series costume supervisor Katie Saunders incorporated this particular quirk when approving designs. Like Davis knew, it’s paying attention to the little details that help a performer build and inhabit a character.

Beth Ann Gallagher

2 Comments

  1. Reply

    Patricia Nolan-Hall (@CaftanWoman)

    March 5, 2017

    Indeed the devil is in the details. I haven’t even checked to see if we’re getting this on FX Canada. I’m leery of recreations of classic personalities. I’ll close my eyes, cross my fingers and wait to hear from you.

    • Reply

      msbethg

      March 6, 2017

      I’ve delayed watching the show until tonight. I’m definitely not expecting true biographies because of all the campy commercials. I’m approaching watching the series as something based on real life. I’ll let you know what I think!

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

About

Blogger Beth Ann Gallagher explores the best of all eras of film and television, with a special emphasis on the classic, silent, period pieces, and international.

Subscribe

Never miss a post! Subscribe and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 116 other subscribers
CMBA Logo
Follow me on Twitter